home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=91TT0432>
- <link 90TT2749>
- <title>
- Feb. 25, 1991: Don't Reject A Cease-Fire
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
- Feb. 25, 1991 Beginning Of The End
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- THE GULF WAR, Page 50
- Don't Reject a Cease-Fire
- </hdr><body>
- <p>Holding out for complete surrender as an alternative to any
- peace negotiations will guarantee a long, destructive war,
- fracture the alliance and destabilize the region
- </p>
- <p>By Jimmy Carter
- </p>
- <p> Saddam Hussein has always had two options: 1) to withdraw
- from Kuwait and avoid destruction of his forces or 2) not to
- surrender the invaded territory, let his country absorb allied
- attacks and fight a defensive ground war. Neither alternative
- has ever been particularly attractive to the U.S. and its
- allies, even before the war began. In the first case, Iraq's
- military power would have been preserved; in the second, allied
- casualties would be higher.
- </p>
- <p> We now face the choice between a prolonged conflict or a
- partial survival of Saddam's power. Our overwhelming force will
- prevail. But what will we do after we have destroyed a good
- portion of Iraq's military, ravaged Iraq's industrial
- infrastructure, severed fresh-water-supply systems in major
- cities and driven Iraqi military forces out of Kuwait? Will we
- pursue the retreating Iraqis mile by mile, ultimately to impose
- unconditional surrender?
- </p>
- <p> Whether we like it or not, the U.S. is being criticized for
- the sustained nationwide attacks on Iraq, which Soviet leaders
- and others claim to be exceeding the U.N. mandate for the
- ejection of Iraqi forces from Kuwait. Also, highly publicized
- evidence of damage to nonmilitary areas is arousing concern.
- No matter how limited or inadvertent this damage may be, the
- vivid pictures of destroyed homes and children's bodies being
- removed from air-raid shelters are a propaganda victory for
- Saddam.
- </p>
- <p> Islamic leaders, in Iran and even among our own allies, have
- been calling for a peace effort, which would have to include
- a cease-fire. During this period, an unequivocal commitment
- from Saddam and united pressure from the alliance, including
- the Soviet Union, would be necessary to assure Iraq's total
- withdrawal from Kuwait.
- </p>
- <p> We should not reject the option of a cease-fire. To
- foreclose this possibility and demand complete surrender as an
- alternative to any peace negotiations, even after Saddam's
- expressed willingness to withdraw from Kuwait is confirmed, is
- to ensure a long and destructive war, a fragmentation of the
- alliance and the likelihood of a destabilized Middle East.
- Complete destruction of Iraq's army will leave the country
- defenseless against Iran and Syria. If we insist also that
- Saddam face trial as a war criminal, then he is not likely to
- yield except as an act of finality and hopelessness, regardless
- of the devastation suffered by his country.
- </p>
- <p> It is true that a cease-fire could permit some repairs and
- possible adjustments of Iraqi forces. These benefits could be
- minimized by the terms of the allied announcement of a truce,
- which might preclude the rebuilding of bridges or the
- redeployment of armored units. Pinpoint attacks by our smart
- bombs could stop these actions even during the respite period.
- </p>
- <p> After more than 73,000 sorties against Iraq and its military
- sites, with minimal losses by the U.S. and its allies, Saddam
- and his top officials must now be convinced that the allies can
- continue this one-sided devastation indefinitely. There is
- little doubt that Iraq's anticipation of victory over the
- allied forces has dissipated.
- </p>
- <p> If the Iraqis make a legitimate offer to withdraw from
- Kuwait, a cease-fire and negotiations--with our support but
- under Arab or other international auspices--would let Iraqi
- leaders and private citizens put additional pressure on Saddam
- to comply with the more limited Security Council demands. The
- achievement of immediate American goals cannot be guaranteed
- by such a pause in the war. Even rejection of the peace effort
- by the Iraqis, however, will put the onus of the continuing
- conflict on their leaders, giving the allied forces a
- significant propaganda victory. It will also help clarify our
- ultimate objectives, to ourselves and to the world. Involving
- others in negotiations will make it easier for the withdrawal
- of U.S. forces from the region once the conflict is resolved.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-